<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MOSS Split Back-to-Back in the Real World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/windows-admin/moss-split-back-to-back-in-the-real-world-part1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/windows-admin/moss-split-back-to-back-in-the-real-world-part1/</link>
	<description>I AM the system administrator. Who do I call?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:23:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RhysGoodwin</title>
		<link>http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/windows-admin/moss-split-back-to-back-in-the-real-world-part1/#comment-1407</link>
		<dc:creator>RhysGoodwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 21:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/?p=350#comment-1407</guid>
		<description>Thanks Praveen, Great solution!  I tested reporting integration but we still haven&#039;t actually implemented it so this will be a big help.

Cheers,
Rhys</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Praveen, Great solution!  I tested reporting integration but we still haven&#8217;t actually implemented it so this will be a big help.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Rhys</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praveen</title>
		<link>http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/windows-admin/moss-split-back-to-back-in-the-real-world-part1/#comment-1391</link>
		<dc:creator>Praveen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/?p=350#comment-1391</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the nice write up. Here is small implementation of how to solve the issue to show the report in all zones.
http://praveenbattula.blogspot.com/2011/08/customize-reportviewerwebpart-in-c-and.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the nice write up. Here is small implementation of how to solve the issue to show the report in all zones.<br />
<a href="http://praveenbattula.blogspot.com/2011/08/customize-reportviewerwebpart-in-c-and.html" rel="nofollow">http://praveenbattula.blogspot.com/2011/08/customize-reportviewerwebpart-in-c-and.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhys</title>
		<link>http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/windows-admin/moss-split-back-to-back-in-the-real-world-part1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 11:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/?p=350#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Hey you can email me firstname.lastname at gmail. Actually in the email alert for the comment the spaces are correct so I can see what you mean. Are you intending to use ISA server? Ie Xnet Firewall is ISA and perimeter firewall is ISA? I can&#039;t think of any reason why this wouldn&#039;t work. I will be quite an over head in management, public addresses space etc. As long as you allow the right traffic, it doesn&#039;t matter how many firewalls you have. I don&#039;t know what your business is and what policies are but by the sounds of it you&#039;re being required to configure it in this because of some perceived security benefits. IMHO it&#039;s better to keep it simple and you might want point out to your corp team that this method might not be in line with Microsoft recommendations and that the added complexity means more chance of holes. If you want to discuss in more detail drop me an email/google IM. Cheers,
Rhys</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey you can email me firstname.lastname at gmail. Actually in the email alert for the comment the spaces are correct so I can see what you mean. Are you intending to use ISA server? Ie Xnet Firewall is ISA and perimeter firewall is ISA? I can&#8217;t think of any reason why this wouldn&#8217;t work. I will be quite an over head in management, public addresses space etc. As long as you allow the right traffic, it doesn&#8217;t matter how many firewalls you have. I don&#8217;t know what your business is and what policies are but by the sounds of it you&#8217;re being required to configure it in this because of some perceived security benefits. IMHO it&#8217;s better to keep it simple and you might want point out to your corp team that this method might not be in line with Microsoft recommendations and that the added complexity means more chance of holes. If you want to discuss in more detail drop me an email/google IM. Cheers,<br />
Rhys</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seshu kumar adiraju</title>
		<link>http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/windows-admin/moss-split-back-to-back-in-the-real-world-part1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>seshu kumar adiraju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 05:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/?p=350#comment-157</guid>
		<description>oops the spaces got deleted... is there a way to attach a schematic for what I&#039;m thinking.. or mail? :)

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops the spaces got deleted&#8230; is there a way to attach a schematic for what I&#8217;m thinking.. or mail? <img src='http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seshu kumar adiraju</title>
		<link>http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/windows-admin/moss-split-back-to-back-in-the-real-world-part1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>seshu kumar adiraju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 05:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/?p=350#comment-156</guid>
		<description>Hi Rhys,

Great article.
I&#039;m thinking of one variant. My corp team insists on more cleaner separation between paths taken by internal and external users. They want the network  to be physically isolated between these modes of access.

Wanted to check if this kind of split topology is possible.
Not sure if I&#039;m making sense, please advise.

Corp Xnet                                 External users
     &#124;                                                &#124;
Xnet Firewall                            Perimeter Firewall
     &#124;                                                &#124;
Xnet WFE (Corp DC auth)    Perimeter WFE(PerimeterDC)      
           &#124;                                          &#124;
           ---------------------------------
                                      &#124;
                                 Firewall
                                      &#124;
             WFE(intranet), DB and App (Corp Domain)
                                      &#124;
                      Corp resources</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rhys,</p>
<p>Great article.<br />
I&#8217;m thinking of one variant. My corp team insists on more cleaner separation between paths taken by internal and external users. They want the network  to be physically isolated between these modes of access.</p>
<p>Wanted to check if this kind of split topology is possible.<br />
Not sure if I&#8217;m making sense, please advise.</p>
<p>Corp Xnet                                 External users<br />
     |                                                |<br />
Xnet Firewall                            Perimeter Firewall<br />
     |                                                |<br />
Xnet WFE (Corp DC auth)    Perimeter WFE(PerimeterDC)<br />
           |                                          |<br />
           &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
                                      |<br />
                                 Firewall<br />
                                      |<br />
             WFE(intranet), DB and App (Corp Domain)<br />
                                      |<br />
                      Corp resources</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhys</title>
		<link>http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/windows-admin/moss-split-back-to-back-in-the-real-world-part1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 02:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/?p=350#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Hey Man, good to hear from you. Trust all is good in your new job, things hear and all good, you know how it is ;-). Yeah don&#039;t remind me about tough guy! I&#039;ve not done much training! Ah well it&#039;ll be good to catch up anyway :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Man, good to hear from you. Trust all is good in your new job, things hear and all good, you know how it is <img src='http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> . Yeah don&#8217;t remind me about tough guy! I&#8217;ve not done much training! Ah well it&#8217;ll be good to catch up anyway <img src='http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raymund</title>
		<link>http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/windows-admin/moss-split-back-to-back-in-the-real-world-part1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 01:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/?p=350#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Hey Dude how are you doing, hope everything is fine there in STJ?  I have a question from my blog (http://anyrest.wordpress.com/2010/06/17/integrating-sharepoint-2010-and-sql-reporting-services-2008-in-6-easy-steps/) and I remember you already covered this one so I redirected to this great article of yours.  Hope thats alright!  Tough Guy is 2 weeks away!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dude how are you doing, hope everything is fine there in STJ?  I have a question from my blog (<a href="http://anyrest.wordpress.com/2010/06/17/integrating-sharepoint-2010-and-sql-reporting-services-2008-in-6-easy-steps/" rel="nofollow">http://anyrest.wordpress.com/2010/06/17/integrating-sharepoint-2010-and-sql-reporting-services-2008-in-6-easy-steps/</a>) and I remember you already covered this one so I redirected to this great article of yours.  Hope thats alright!  Tough Guy is 2 weeks away!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhys</title>
		<link>http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/windows-admin/moss-split-back-to-back-in-the-real-world-part1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 00:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/?p=350#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Thanks for you comment Erik. Yes you&#039;re correct,  only one zone is required. ISA makes the authentication seamless. It&#039;s great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for you comment Erik. Yes you&#8217;re correct,  only one zone is required. ISA makes the authentication seamless. It&#8217;s great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik Erlendsson</title>
		<link>http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/windows-admin/moss-split-back-to-back-in-the-real-world-part1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Erlendsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rhysgoodwin.com/?p=350#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Rhys,

Great article.  It seems like in this arrangement you would only need one zone (just Default, instead of Default and Extranet), since internal and external users are using the same authentication mechanism.  Is that correct, or am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rhys,</p>
<p>Great article.  It seems like in this arrangement you would only need one zone (just Default, instead of Default and Extranet), since internal and external users are using the same authentication mechanism.  Is that correct, or am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

